data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b08cd/b08cd21a13d453ae7ec2e9ef7e8d3f85ad7ae4cc" alt="View Edward V. Byrne's LinkedIn profile"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f13f/9f13f4cb65a059941f1f2e366af7806a0df650e5" alt="Follow edvbyrne on Twitter"
Follow The Mexico Gulf Reporter Blog here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e89a8/e89a8fc69ebe4925a87c551fe37d47ba9f292e36" alt="0002"
In recent months a damage hearing was held on the claim, and today a magistrate recommended that judgment be entered against al-Qaida for $9.3 billion USD. The magistrate found the actual damages to be $3.1 billion, but at the plaintiffs' request he tripled them, as allowed by federal law. The magistrate's ruling now goes to a U.S. district judge, who likely will approve it as a matter of course.
Unless assets traceable to al-Qaida are discovered, the judgment will be worth no more than the paper on which it's printed. But civil judgments in the United States never expire, provided they are periodically renewed.
No comments:
Post a Comment